Technology risk and regulatory readiness for a financial institution
Prepared a Pakistani financial institution for a State Bank of Pakistan review with a risk framework, owned controls and board-level risk reporting.
Service 01 · Govern & Assure
We help organisations identify, assess and manage technology risk across people, process, technology and data, with strong governance and regulatory compliance.
Situations where organisations typically ask us for help.
Technology risks are tracked informally, and controls have not been designed or mapped against a recognised framework.
You need to show regulators such as SBP, SECP, PTA, NCA or SAMA that requirements are mapped, gaps are known and evidence is ready.
Directors need clear, decision-ready reporting on risk appetite, key risk indicators and remediation progress.
Privilege misuse, data manipulation and third-party dependencies have not been assessed or monitored.
Risk framework (ISO 31000), appetite, registers, KRIs, scenario analysis and board reporting.
Governance frameworks, policies, control design and mapping, Three Lines Model, board support.
Regulatory mapping, gap assessments and audit readiness across SBP, SECP, PTA, NCA and SAMA.
Technology-enabled fraud scenarios, privilege misuse and data manipulation risks, with roadmaps.
Vendor due diligence, third-party risk framework, SLA and contract review, ongoing monitoring.
Control effectiveness testing and KRI monitoring that reveal gaps and drive maturity.
Context, assets and threats.
Likelihood, impact, inherent risk.
Preventive, detective, corrective.
Implement controls, track KRIs.
Assurance and maturity.
Prepared a Pakistani financial institution for a State Bank of Pakistan review with a risk framework, owned controls and board-level risk reporting.
Our regulatory compliance work covers regulatory mapping, gap assessments and audit readiness across the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), SECP and PTA in Pakistan, and NCA and SAMA in Saudi Arabia.
We build risk frameworks on ISO 31000 and draw on ISO 27001, COBIT 2019, NIST CSF, COSO and SOC 2. Controls are designed and mapped using the Three Lines Model.
Typically a risk framework and policy, a risk register with heatmaps, a control library and Statement of Applicability (SoA), and a KRI dashboard for board reporting.
Yes. We assess technology-enabled fraud scenarios, privilege misuse and data manipulation risks, and we cover third-party risk through vendor due diligence, a third-party risk framework, SLA and contract review and ongoing monitoring.
Through continuous assurance. Control effectiveness testing and KRI monitoring reveal gaps and drive maturity, which is the final "review and improve" step of our approach.
Other services in Technology & Transformation · Govern & Assure
Maturity assessments, governance structures and operating model design.
Independent, risk-based assurance and audit committee support.
Talk to us about the right combination of services for your organisation.